What I meant to convey is that "slaves" in a normal, healthy BDSM-context are not literal slaves -- not that literal slaves don't exist today or that the BDSM concept of slavery could not be abused. In a normal, healthy BDSM-context, there's an element of fantasy in the Master/slave relationship because there's ongoing consent.
In my opinion, what you describe crosses the line from normal-healthy into abuse, and I in no way wish to dismiss or diminish what you and others have gone through.






Reply With Quote
